Andrew G.
Bostom
Dr. King: Anti-Zionism Is
Anti-Semitism |
Martin Luther King,
Jr. possessed a remarkable clarity of vision and purpose. He complemented
these attributes with a sound, empathic understanding of the history
of human oppression. Dr. King's unequivocal renunciation of anti-Zionism
reflected his consistent, courageous opposition to all manifestations
of bigotry. Against the backdrop of resurgent Jew hatred worldwide,
epitomized by the hypocritical September 2001 Durban Conference
on "Racism", Dr. King's candid, thoughtful reflections
on the true nature of anti-Zionism are particularly edifying.
Shortly before his death, Dr. King had the
moral courage to confront the burgeoning Jew hatred of both extreme
leftwing Black organizations, including the Black Panthers
and the radicalized Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee,
as well as the Black Muslims. For example, during a 1968 appearance
at Harvard University, he stated bluntly:
"When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews, You are talking
anti-Semitism." [ from "The Socialism of Fools: The Left,
the Jews and Israel" by Seymour Martin Lipset; in Encounter
magazine, December 1969, p. 24. ].
King immediately recognized anti-Zionism as anti-Semitism- Judenhass
- refusing to indulge what he believed was simply another manifestation
of the same hatred confronting Blacks. As Georgia Congressman John
Lewis, who worked closely with Dr. King during the civil rights
movement, observed last year on Martin Luther King Day,
"He knew that both peoples [i.e., Blacks and Jews] were uprooted
involuntarily from their homelands. He knew that both peoples were
shaped by the tragic experience of slavery. He knew that both peoples
were forced to live in ghettoes, victims of segregation. He knew
that both peoples w
ere subject to laws passed with the particular intent of oppressing
them simply because they were Jewish or black. He knew that both
peoples have been subjected to oppression and genocide on a level
unprecedented in history."
(San Francisco Chronicle, Monday, January 21, 2002)
Historically, 20th century black intellectuals prominent before Dr.
King had regarded the Zionist movement favorably because of their
own strong impulses for self-determination. W.E.B. DuBois in 1919
wrote, "the African movement means to us what the Zionist movement
must mean to the Jews.." In 1941, DuBois elaborated that Palestine
was, "the only refuge that harassed Jewry has today". During
Israel’s War of Independence, Menachem Begin recalled that Dr. Ralph
Bunche, Jr. conveyed to him, "I can understand you. I am also
a member of a persecuted minority." Dr. King’s empathic awareness
revealed a profound understanding of both the Jews complex embrace
of Zionism, and the thinly veiled Jew hatred inherent in anti-Zionism,
"After 2000 years of exile, the Jewish People has emerged
traumatized. The source of that trauma has been the constant insecurity
and fear that characterized most of the Diaspora, in most parts
of the world. It is a product of landlessness, massacres, periodic
expulsion and flight, persecution by tyrants and abuse by the Church
and Mosque who encouraged antisemitism to satisfy their own insecurities
and political desires. …Physical security for the Jews has traditionally
been improved in a number of ways: usefulness, mobility, bribery
and assimilation. Psychological responses to this insecurity and
trauma are well known: self-hatred and blame, identification with
and appeasement of abusers, obsessive fantasy of a future paradise
on earth. These solutions and responses are so integrated into the
Jewish psyche that they have been passed down from generation to
generation, displaying themselves even in relatively free societies,
even in America and the recently liberated homeland, Israel….Despite
its significance to the Jewish Nation, the State of Israel has failed
to alleviate most of this trauma, and has not reduced the levels
of antisemitism - it has simply allowed antisemites to masquerade
themselves under the new banner of "anti-Zionism". We
cannot expect antisemitism to disappear - Jewish existence and Jewish
philosophy will always be threatening to its children: Christianity,
and Islam... The trauma and insecurity, on the other hand, is within
our power to diminish - should we decide to do so…And what is anti-Zionist?
It is the denial to the Jewish people of a fundamental right that
we justly claim for the people of Africa and freely accord all other
nations of the Globe. It is discrimination against Jews, my friend,
because they are Jews. In short, it is antisemitism….The antisemite
rejoices at any opportunity to vent his malice. The times have made
it unpopular, in the West, to proclaim openly a hatred of the Jews.
This being the case, the antisemite must constantly seek new forms
and forums for his poison. How he must revel in the new masquerade!
He does not hate the Jews, he is just 'anti-Zionist'!..."
Dr. King’s deep historical, theological, and social understanding
are sorely missed. But there are hopeful signs. The influence of
shrill, shallow demagogues such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton,
may be waning. Their hypocritical agenda has been exposed: A perverse
"Third Worldism", where jihad terror against a democratic
Israel is rationalized, while the slaughter, enslavement, and mutilation
of tens of thousands of Black African South Sudanese Christians
and animists during a jihad campaign waged against them by the Islamist
Arab Khartoum government, is ignored. The indifference of Reverends
Jackson and Sharpton notwithstanding, Dr. Charles Jacobs, an Orthodox
Jew and founder of the American Anti-Slavery Group, helped forge
an extraordinary coalition with Congressional Black Caucus members,
as well as various Christian and Jewish organizations, that lobbied
successfully for the passage of the Sudan Peace Act. Columnist Nat
Hentoff summarized the salient features of this legislation as follows
(http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20021104-26222734.htm):
"…The Sudan Peace Act authorizes $300 million to aid the blacks
in the south over the next three years for humanitarian purposes
and ‘to prepare the population for peace and democratic governance.’
Under the law, the president is to certify every six months that
the Khartoum government and the [South] Sudan People's Liberation
Army are negotiating in good faith. If he finds that they are not,
sanctions go into effect. As described, for example, by the [Human
Rights organization] Freedom House, if there is evidence of ‘continued
bombing of civilians, slave raids, and bans on relief flights,’
the United States will oppose ‘international loans and credits to
Khartoum,’ and among other punitive actions, seek ‘a U.N. Security
Council Resolution to impose an arms embargo on Khartoum.’.. ."
It is reassuring to see the direct, lasting impact of Dr. King’s
noble legacy on this contemporary struggle for human rights: as
an impressionable college student, Dr. Jacobs stood on the Washington
mall listening to the "I Have a Dream" speech.
FrontPage magazin, 20.09.2003
Discuss in the
Forum 
go back
|